Why Do People Keep Saying That Bulldozers Were Used In The Two Attacks In Israel?

Neither criminal used a bulldozer. Why not use facts? Why should a criminal’s family be punished for a criminal act the family was not involved in?

Bookmark It

Hide Sites

Tags: Attacks, Bulldozers, Israel, Keep, People, Saying, That, Used, Were

This entry was posted on Monday, January 18th, 2010 at 10:54 pm and is filed under general. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

4 Responses to “Why Do People Keep Saying That Bulldozers Were Used In The Two Attacks In Israel?”

1. E.A. Boyd Says:
   January 19th, 2010 at 5:52 am

   Because the media called it a bulldozer.http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1004…
   They also called it a terrorist attack.
   It is part of the propaganda to call everything you can in the most shocking and horrifying terms and label it as terrorist right now.
   It is much more dramatic than saying it was a depressed and troubled teenager running a tractor type loader.
   ——-
   Look at the answers you got here. The propaganda works. Most of those answering want to murder Palestinians now as a result of it.
   The first thing propaganda does is dehumanize your enemy so you can hate them with no remorse because they are subhuman, and then it starts stoking the hatred.

2. GivPerf Says:
   January 19th, 2010 at 12:25 pm

   Does it really matter whether it was a bulldozer or a front-end loader or whatever? The point is, both times Arabs on heavy-duty construction vehicles went on rampage and killed and wounded innocent Israelis, including infants and children.

3. Lando Says:
   January 19th, 2010 at 2:52 pm

   Because most people who are unfamiliar with heavy equipment dont know what a front end loader is so bulldozer is a generic term, kinda like kleenex.

4. Shay p Says:
   January 19th, 2010 at 7:49 pm

   Because to some a plane is a plane
   777 or a Constellation
   and every ground mover is a bulldozer.
   For the same reason a family is held responsible when their dog bites.
   When a parent knows and does nothing he is legally responsible, so is anyone that knows a crime is going to be committed and does nothing.
   And don’t tell me they don’t know, the family ties are such that all know all.
   An accessory must generally have knowledge that a crime is being, or will be committed. A person with such knowledge may become an accessory by helping or encouraging the criminal in some way, or simply by failing to report the crime to proper authority. The assistance to the criminal may be of any type, including emotional or financial assistance as well as physical assistance or concealment.
   We are talking mad dogs ain’t we ??

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.